The condition of big tech regulation in Canada, from privacy to tax policy

For several years, Canadian federal government policy toward significant tech firms was effectively a arms-off affair: getting in the way not only threatened to hurt the financial system, but voters may well rebel as well. But as foreign tech platforms these kinds of as Google and Fb have grown, governments below and all over the entire world have begun to look for out ways to rein in their outsized influence and power. Listed here, the Post’s Barbara Shecter breaks down the state of major tech regulation in Canada, from privateness to tax policy and everything in in between.



screen of a cell phone: As tech firms like Facebook and Google have grown in influence, governments around the world have considered ways to rein in their power.


© Supplied by Economical Publish
As tech corporations like Facebook and Google have grown in affect, governments all around the environment have regarded as approaches to rein in their electrical power.

What are the important difficulties?

The vital parts where Canada is relocating to regulate foreign tech platforms drop into 4 principal buckets: dangerous content material these as dislike speech purchaser and data privacy taxation and broadcasting/telecom and written content. It will involve a quantity of governing administration officers, departments, and agencies including the Department of Canadian Heritage, the Ministry of Innovation, Science and Field, and the Division of Finance. The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Fee and the Canada Revenue Company are also involved.

What about detest speech?

The superior-profile ejection of former United States President Donald Trump from Twitter and other social media platforms sparked a significant discussion on how to police despise speech and prevent disinformation on social media even though at the very same time preserving flexibility of speech and the right to political expression. The Canadian federal government has stated it will soon introduce laws that would make very good on Key Minister Justin Trudeau’s pledge to force the tech platforms to instantly eliminate unlawful articles including hate speech. “Our intention is to table … legislation this winter on on-line harms,” a spokesperson for Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault’s office environment said Friday. The law, if passed, would demand social media companies to monitor and eliminate unlawful written content together with dislike speech, terrorist propaganda, violent acts and little one pornography. The department said the legislation also aims to respect freedom of speech.

What about electronic taxation?

A several years ago, any mention of a “Netflix tax” sent shoppers and voters into a tizzy and elected officials working for address. Not any longer. The favourable tax position of foreign tech platforms is now squarely in the government’s sights. In the slide economic assertion in November, finance minster Chrystia Freeland claimed the federal government intends to implement a “tax on companies supplying digital services” in Canada commencing Jan. 1, 2022. Canada has been operating the OECD and much more than 100 other nations on a co-ordinated method to world wide tax reform that could involve a taxing correct for nations wherever multinational companies are supplying digital products and services to people — but there have been delays and Canada explained it intends transfer ahead on its own with the new measures expected to boost federal revenues by $3.4 billion more than 5 decades. Canada also designs to start demanding “non-resident vendors” giving digital merchandise and providers to Canadian customers — such as Netflix — to accumulate and remit product sales tax (GST and HST).

What about information and privacy?

In November, Navdeep Bains, then Minister of Innovation, Science and Field, introduced Monthly bill C-11, the  Digital Charter Implementation Act , which will overhaul the legislation governing the privateness of Canadians. The monthly bill claims hefty monetary penalties — far more significant to giant tech platforms this sort of as Google, Fb, and Amazon — for breaches, and gives far more electric power to consumers when it will come to the transfer of private info from 1 organization to a different and the disposal of personalized facts. If passed, the regulation will restrict the assortment of personalized information and demand providers to doc the functions for which personal information and facts is gathered, used, or disclosed (with continual updates if new needs come up).

What about broadcasting?

Guilbeault released Monthly bill C-10, the 1st big legislative amendments to the  Broadcasting Act  since 1991. The bill would set “online undertakings” that transmit applications over the Internet in just the purview of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Fee. “Including online activity in just Canada’s broadcast regulatory framework alerts a key policy change,” in accordance to law firm at DLA Piper. Nevertheless, the legislation agency pointed out, it remains to be determined what disorders and specifications the CRTC will impose on on-line vendors the moment the bill results in being regulation.

What about information?

Guilbeault’s business has taken the direct when it comes to finding a way to get massive tech companies to fork out for news content they element on their platforms. Guilbeault has reported he is wanting into products adopted by France and Australia. “We are at present discovering possibilities for a produced-in-Canada system that would ultimately guide to a complete, coherent and equitable digital framework for both of those Canadian information publishers and digital platforms,” a office spokesperson stated Friday. France is extracting payment through copyright guidelines, although the Australian Senate is scrutinizing proposed legislation — by now passed by the decreased house — that would mandate a compulsory bargaining code involving the country’s media publishers and significant tech platforms such as Google and Facebook. The proposed code contains non-exclusion and arbitration mechanisms and would be overseen by Australia’s competition authority.

Where does the opposition stand?

NDP heritage critic Alexandre Boulerice said he is upset a couple of products did not make it into Bill C-10, notably provisions governing social media platforms Facebook and Youtube. In addition, Boulerice said he experienced been under the impact the Liberal federal government was likely to include things like a system in the Broadcasting Act overhaul to compensate information information creators whose get the job done is featured on significant tech platforms Google and Fb. That didn’t transpire. “Newspapers are struggling. They have to get some compensation for the actual journalistic perform they are performing.”

NDP MP Charlie Angus, a member of the standing committee on access to info, privacy and ethics, stated the Liberal govt is building development with the guarantee of larger, more significant penalties for to rein in tech platforms that failed to take part or comply with Canadian initiatives in the past. But he stated Ottawa must be executing additional to maintain the intercontinental tech giants dependable for how their algorithms feed details to end users. “You would see the algorithms cleaned up true rapid if they ended up held liable,” Angus reported.

The Conservative occasion has been vital of the rate of the Trudeau government’s motion when it will come to the safety of buyer facts and cyber security. But there has been help for some of the tax issues, these types of as necessitating international electronic gamers to gather and remit GST. In their election system in 2019, the Conservatives proposed a a few for every cent tax on Facebook, Google, and Amazon that would be waived only if the tech providers invested and developed on their operations in Canada.